Datos sobre la tenencia de los bosques
Tenencia forestal en Asia
Tenencia forestal en Asia
Los Datos de Rastreo de Tenencia de RRI, evalúan los avances y reveses mundiales en cuanto a los derechos legalmente reconocidos de los pueblos indígenas, afrodescendientes, comunidades locales y mujeres a los bosques, tierra y recursos naturales. Explore datos sobre Asia.
Explore los conjuntos de datos disponibles:
Datos sobre la tenencia de bosques
Datos sobre la tenencia de bosques
Datos sobre la tenencia de la tierra
Datos sobre la tenencia de la tierra
Datos sobre la tenencia del agua
Datos sobre la tenencia del agua
Explore los datos de tenencia forestal de:
Seleccionar País
Angola
Argentina
Australia
Belize
Bhutan
Bolivia
Brasil
Camboya
Camerún
Canadá
República Centroafricana
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
República Democrática del Congo
Ecuador
Etiopía
Finlandia
Gabón
Gambia
Ghana
Guatemala
Guyana
Honduras
India
Indonesia
Japón
Kenia
República de Corea
República Democrática Popular Lao
Liberia
Madagascar
Malasia
Mali
México
Mongolia
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nepal
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Panamá
Papúa Nueva Guinea
Perú
Filipinas
República de Congo
Rusia
Senegal
Sudán del Sur
Sudán
Suriname
Suecia
Tanzania
Tailandia
Timor Oriental
Togo
Estados Unidos
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia
* Utilice la siguiente clave para ver qué datos están disponibles para cada país.
Datos de superficie forestal
Conjunto de derechos forestales y Derechos de las mujeres
Recursos relacionados

New DoR Report (2025):

  • INFORME (Disponible oslo en inglés)
  • RESUMEN EJECUTIVE

Resiliencia y Resistencia: Derechos de las Mujeres a los bosques comunitarios bajo la legislación nacional (2025):

Ante una encrucijada: Tendencias Significativas en el Reconocimiento de la Tenencia Forestal Comunitaria de 2002 a 2017 (2018)

Una referencia global de almacenamiento de carbono en territorios colectivos (2018)

      Metodología

      Examina el grado en que los marcos jurídicos nacionales reconocen los derechos sobre la tierra de los pueblos indígenas y las comunidades locales en estos 17 países de Asia:

      Bundle of Rights in Asia

      RRI maintains detailed qualitative data on the strength of Forest Tenure rights legally held by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities in X countries in Latin America. Learn more about RRI’s Bundle of Rights Methodology
      here.

      • 2016
      • 2024
      Reconocimiento pleno Reconocimiento parcial Sin reconocimiento Caso por caso

      Sources: RRI. 2016. Depth of Rigths Database.

      Reconocimiento pleno Reconocimiento parcial Sin reconocimiento Caso por caso

      Sources: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rigths Database.


      Contextual Indicators

      RRI maintains detailed qualitative data on the strength of Forest Tenure rights legally held by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities in 35 countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Learn more about RRI’s Bundle of Rights Methodology here.

      Cultural/Religious Use
      RRI maintains detailed qualitative data on the strength of Forest Tenure rights legally held by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities in 35 countries. Contextual indicators are used to ...


      Learn more about RRI’s Bundle of Rights Methodology here.
      Reconocimiento pleno Sin reconocimiento

      Sources: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.

      Free, Prior and Informed Consent
      RRI maintains detailed qualitative data on the strength of Forest Tenure rights legally held by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and local communities in 35 countries. Contextual indicators are used to ...


      Learn more about RRI’s Bundle of Rights Methodology here.
      Reconocimiento pleno Sin reconocimiento Caso por caso

      Sources: RRI. 2024. Depth of Rights Database.


      Women's Rights to community Forests, Global Data

      RRI’s Gender Database builds on the Bundle of Rights to assess the extent to which the same 30 countries’ legal frameworks recognize Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and local community women’s specific rights to community forests, and whether those states are meeting their obligations under national and international laws. These frameworks, called community-based tenure regimes (CBTRs), are defined distinguishable sets of national, state-issued laws and regulations governing “all situations under which the right to own or manage terrestrial natural resources is held at the community level.”

      Learn more about RRI’s Gender Methodology here.

      • 2016
      • 2024
      Overarching (11 Countries)
      CBTR-Specific (27 CBTRs)
      Reconocimiento pleno Reconocimiento parcial Sin reconocimiento Caso por caso Sin determinar
      Overarching (11 Countries)
      CBTR-Specific (27 CBTRs)
      Reconocimiento pleno Reconocimiento parcial Sin reconocimiento Caso por caso Sin abordar
      Cambio en la distribución de la tenencia forestal en ... países de Asia, 2002-2017

      La base de datos sobre tenencia forestal de RRI realiza un seguimiento de la distribución legal de la tenencia forestal desde 2002. Según la tipología de RRI, toda la superficie forestal de los países estudiados se clasifica como: (1) Administrada por el gobierno; (2) Designada para los pueblos indígenas, los pueblos afrodescendientes y las comunidades locales; (3) Propiedad de los pueblos indígenas, los pueblos afrodescendientes y las comunidades locales; o (4) Propiedad privada de particulares y empresas. Para más información sobre la metodología de esta clasificación, haga clic aquí.

      Fuente: RRI. 2018. Ante una encrucijada: Tendencias Significativas en el Reconocimiento de la Tenencia Forestal Comunitaria de 2002 a 2017.

      Distribución de la tenencia forestal en Asia, Mha

      Explore datos a nivel país sobre la distribución de la tenencia forestal a lo largo del tiempo.  Haz clic en el nombre de un país, para aprender más sobre los marcos legales que reconocen la tenencia comunitaria, incluso los derechos específicos de las mujeres indígenas, afrodescendientes y comunitarias.

      País

      Administrado por el gobierno

      2002 2017

      Designado para Pueblos Indígenas, Pueblos Afrodescendientes y Comunidades Locales

      2002 2017

      Propiedad de Pueblos Indígenas, Pueblos Afrodescendientes y Comunidades Locales

      2002 2017

      Propiedad privada de individuos y empresas

      2002 2017
      País: Australia
      Government Administered
      2002: 93,96
      2017: 83,30
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,00
      2017: 9,10
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 20,87
      2017: 12,11
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 14,01
      2017: 20,24
      País: Bhutan
      Government Administered
      2002: 2,60
      2017: 2,65
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,001
      2017: 0,08
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 0,004
      2017: 0,001
      País: Camboya
      Government Administered
      2002: 11,16
      2017: 7,73
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,00
      2017: 0,46
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: China
      Government Administered
      2002: 76,06
      2017: 75,20
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 103,06
      2017: 124,30
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: India
      Government Administered
      2002: 56,02
      2017: 59,28
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 1,11
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 9,37
      2017: 9,77
      País: Indonesia
      Government Administered
      2002: 97,69
      2017: 85,36
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,22
      2017: 0,79
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 0,01
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 1,49
      2017: 4,86
      País: Japón
      Government Administered
      2002: 10,43
      2017: 11,06
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 1,05
      2017: 0,28
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 13,39
      2017: 13,09
      Government Administered
      2002: 1,89
      2017: 2,08
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,03
      2017: 0,005
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 4,50
      2017: 4,25
      Government Administered
      2002: 16,53
      2017: 18,74
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 0,02
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 0,00
      2017: 0,00
      País: Malasia
      Government Administered
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: Mongolia
      Government Administered
      2002: 12,89
      2017: 8,94
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 3,35
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: Myanmar
      Government Administered
      2002: 34,23
      2017: 28,88
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,02
      2017: 0,16
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: Nepal
      Government Administered
      2002: 4,63
      2017: 4,54
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 1,02
      2017: 2,07
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 0,002
      2017: 0,002
      Government Administered
      2002: 0,90
      2017: 0,84
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 29,20
      2017: 27,01
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 0,03
      2017: 0,03
      País: Filipinas
      Government Administered
      2002: 13,84
      2017: 9,46
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 1,97
      2017: 1,64
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 0,04
      2017: 4,71
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: Tailandia
      Government Administered
      2002: 17,01
      2017: 15,87
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 0,48
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Government Administered
      2002: n.d.
      2017: n.d.
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: n.d.
      2017: n.d.
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: n.d.
      2017: n.d.
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: n.d.
      2017: n.d.
      País: Vietnam
      Government Administered
      2002: 11,78
      2017: 13,25
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: 1,13
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: -
      2017: -
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: -
      2017: -
      País: Subtotal, Complete Case LMICs in Asia (16 countries)
      Government Administered
      2002: 355,35
      2017: 330,75
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 3,24
      2017: 10,16
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 132,29
      2017: 157,14
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 10,90
      2017: 14,66
      País: Total, Asia (18 countries)
      Government Administered
      2002: 461,63
      2017: 427,19
      Designated for Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 3,27
      2017: 19,27
      Owned by Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples, and Local Communities
      2002: 154,22
      2017: 169,53
      Privately Owned by Individuals and Firms
      2002: 43
      2017: 52,24

      Los países resaltados en gris indican aquellos con casos completos.
      Los guiones (-) indican aquellas situaciones en que la categoría de tenencia en cuestión, no es legalmente posible bajo la legislación nacional
      n.d. = ningún dato
      Fuente: RRI. 2018. Ante una encrucijada: Tendencias Significativas en el Reconocimiento de la Tenencia Forestal Comunitaria de 2002 a 2017